Electrochemical and hot corrosion behaviour of annealed AlCoCrFeNi HEA coating over steel

The ability to endure extreme corrosion in challenging environments is reduced in stainless steel. This can be addressed by appropriate surface modification techniques to redefine the surface with the required properties. The characteristics of the atmospheric plasma sprayed AlCoCrFeNi High Entropy Alloy (HEA) on SS316l are presented in this study. The coating characterisation revealed uniform coating with homogeneous deposition of gas-atomized AlCoCrFeNi HEA spanning for 150 µm. The coated substrates were further annealed for 2 h at 400 °C, 550 °C, 700 °C and 850 °C and the annealing at 550 °C offered enhanced microstructure. Annealing the coated sample at 550 °C offered a 46% improvement in microhardness against the uncoated sample post-annealing. The electrochemical corrosion tests showcased improved corrosion resistance after annealing through the formation of a protective oxide layer and the influence of HEA. Hot corrosion tests at 900 °C resulted in 10.1%, 8.49%, and 10.36% improved corrosion resistance for the coated sample annealed at 550 °C than the coated sample pre annealing and 44.09%, 44.25%, and 42.09% than the uncoated sample pre annealing under three salt mixtures respectively. The microstructural analysis examines various corrosion modes and verifies the presence and formation of protective oxide layers.

coating on 1Cr18Ni9Ti stainless steel using APS.An increase in 20% hardness was seen in nano-sized Al 2 O 3 coated sample when compared to micro-sized Al 2 O 3 with a significant reduction in the porosity.The wear analysis revealed nano-sized Al 2 O 3 has notable wear resistance and the degree of wear counterpart is significantly less 14 .Patel et al. analysed the microstructural and wear behaviour of the CrMnFeCoNi HEA coating developed over Q235 steel.The coating exhibited FCC phase with a thickness of 380 µm.Subsequent annealing increased the coating thickness by 20 µm and an improvement was found in tribological properties 15 .
The coating process may induce residual stress and needs a proficient technique to surmount the issue 16 .One such approach is the heat treatment process which diminishes the residual stress formed.The annealing process is an assuring process to modify the microstructure and improve mechanical and functional properties 17 .Girolamo et.al performed APS over stainless steel substrate using ZrO 2 -8 wt.%Y 2 O 3 feedstock.The coated substrate is subjected to annealing at 1315 °C for a time duration of 10 and 50 h.The ageing process gradually increases by 13.8% in a monoclinic phase of zirconia and a clear increase in thermal expansion 18 .Steels used in chemical processing plants, and nuclear power plants are exposed to harsh environments and endure corrosion.In some cases, the fluids used there might be at temperatures higher than room temperature.This demands the critical need to analyse the corrosion behaviour of steel at both room and high temperatures.The boiler tube was plasma sprayed with a mixture of alumina and CNT.Hot corrosion behaviour was analysed at 900 °C for 50 cycles for 1 h each.The weight gain was considerably lower for the coated sample when compared to the uncoated sample due to the protective layer formation over the surface 19 .Alloy steel coated with plasma spray was analysed for hot corrosion behaviour on a mixture of sodium hydroxide and vanadium oxide at 700 °C for 1 h and 50 cycles.The weight gain over the number of cycles for the coated samples was lower when compared with uncoated samples which is due to the presence of very minimal pores and voids 20 .Boiler steel plasma sprayed with alumina coating was subjected to hot corrosion analysis at 850 °C for 25 cycles each 1 h in a salt mixture containing sodium sulphate and vanadium pentoxide.The outcome was the coated sample revealed better corrosion resistance at high temperatures than uncoated samples 21 .Boiler steel plasma spray-coated with alumina and titanium oxide was immersed in the salt mixture containing sodium sulphate and vanadium pentoxide for 50 h at 900 °C to study the hot corrosion behaviour.The mass loss was more minimum for titanium oxide-coated steel than the alumina-coated steel revealing its better hot corrosion resistance 22 .
Thus far reported works focus on the coating characterisation of plasma sprayed steels and only very minimal studies were reported with coating HEA and subsequent annealing and hot corrosion behavioural studies.Thus, this work proposes to coat the synthesised AlCoCrFeNi HEA over SS316l steel substrate by the APS process followed by the annealing process and execute microstructural studies and subsequent mechanical testing and corrosion analysis whose results are compared with the uncoated and pre annealed samples and the effect of annealing is evaluated.

Material selection
Metallic elements like Al, Co, Cr, Fe and Ni are chosen as the composition for HEA in this study.The elements Ni and Co improve plasticity, Al, Fe and Co provide mechanical property improvement and Al, Co and Cr enhance the corrosion and oxidation resistance.The elements chosen were with 99% purity and equiatomic ratios.The HEA is formed by the gas atomization process under vacuum.The fact that the atomisation process produces powder particles in spherical shape was the rationale considered to be the synthesis method 23,24 .SS316l grade steel is used in the application as mentioned above and undergoes excessive corrosion over time.The need to curtail the corrosion effects on the steel stands critical and thus SS316l was chosen to be the substrate material and experiments were carried out to refine and study the characteristics.The chemical composition of the SS316l steel is shown in Table 1.

Atmospheric plasma spraying
In the APS process, the powder is fed into its spray gun and upon introduction to the plasma flame, the powder is heated, melted and accelerated with high velocity and impinges upon the substrate surface.This jet of particles cools down rapidly and forms a coating layer over the surface of the substrate.The test samples were prepared by cutting the substrate spanning 10 × 10 mm and 5 mm thick plates with the aid of wire Electric Discharge Machining (EDM).The substrates were grit blasted to clear any surficial defects and moisture is removed by preheating the samples.The APS process was carried out with the argon gas at 100-120 psi pressure and 80-100 scfh flow rate, hydrogen gas at 100 psi pressure and 20-25 scfh flow rate, powder feed rate of 40-50 g/min at 490-500 amps of current.The spray distance was kept in the range between 3-5 inches.
The coated samples are then subjected to annealing by placing the test samples in the furnace at four different temperatures such as 400 °C, 550 °C, 700 °C and 850 °C for 2 h.The annealing conditions were optimised for the HEA coating over steel in reference to the previous findings [25][26][27] .The annealed samples were taken and proceeded with properties evaluation and outcomes are compared with samples prior to annealing.

Properties evaluation
The microstructural analysis of the gas-atomized AlCoCrFeNi HEA powder was carried out with Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), Energy Dispersive x-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) and X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) results.The morphology of the synthesised powder was studied from the SEM images characterised by Gemini 300 SEM equipment with 10 kV as the accelerating voltage.The distinct elemental presence is confirmed by the EDS analysis using the EDS detector lens from Zeiss integrated with SEM equipment.The phase validation is conducted using the Empyrean XRD apparatus with Cu K-α being the X-ray energy with 1.5406 Å wavelength.The test specimens are soft polished with various grades of emery sheet to remove any burrs or impurities and to make the surface flat.The polished samples are then placed for microstructural studies including SEM, EDS, and XRD.In addition, the grain morphology of the coated and annealed sample is studied by Electron Back Scatter Diffraction (EBSD) and analysed with Quanta 3D FEG apparatus.Vickers microhardness is measured using the microhardness tester made by Mitutoyo.The test was carried out as per the standard ASTM 384.The microhardness was measured from the indentation made by 100 g load for 15 s. 15 indentations were measured by the micrometre scale attached to the microhardness tester and the average of these interprets the microhardness of the coating.
An electrochemical corrosion test was conducted using Versastat3-400 electrochemical corrosion tester with 3.5 wt% of H 2 SO 4 solution as the electrolyte.The test sample is immersed in the electrolyte and the corresponding potentiodynamic polarisation curve (PDP) was used to analyse the corrosion behaviour of the coating.The saturated calomel electrode is used as the reference electrode and a Platinum (Pt) electrode is used as the counter electrode with the test sample serving the working electrode.Further, the study is extended by carrying out hot corrosion tests.Three different salt mixtures in which mixture A containing 75% Na 2 SO 4 and balance NaCl, mixture B containing 70% Na 2 SO 4 , 20% NaCl and balance V 2 O 5 and mixture C containing 60% Na 2 SO 4 , 20%NaCl and balance V 2 O 5 were prepared based on the applications mentioned-reason.The salt mixtures were applied to the test specimens which include uncoated and coated samples before and after annealing and placed in a furnace at 900 °C for 5 h.The coated surface of the test samples was only exposed to the salt mixtures and the uncoated surfaces were insulated to analyse the effect of corrosion of the coating.This is repeated for 10 cycles covering 50 h as the immersion time.The corresponding weight loss is measured and plotted as a graph against the cycles to analyse the hot corrosion behaviour.The corroded specimens are then subjected to microstructural examination including SEM, EDS and XRD to analyse the micro level changes induced after the corrosion.The significant methodology of the proposed work is presented in Fig. 1.

Microstructure analysis
The microstructure analysis of the gas-atomized AlCoCrFeNi HEA powder was executed.The SEM morphology of the HEA powder is shown in Fig. 2a,b.The powder morphology was found to be spherical particles closely packed and uniform and homogeneous.Also, minor quasi-spherical formation on the bigger spheroids is observed which in any case have not deviated from the ideal results and reflect the previous findings 28 .The attribute of the gas atomization process is the formation of spherical particles which is noticeable from the SEM image of the synthesised HEA powder 29,30 .The mean particle size of the HEA powder particles ranged between 20 -25 µm.The individual elements added to form HEA are confirmed by the EDS mapping shown in Fig. 2c.It also confirms the absence of impurities making the purity of the synthesised AlCoCrFeNi HEA powder significant that could influence the properties.The phase structure of the HEA powder was evolved to be BCC phase validated with the reference including miller indices.The XRD also validates the formation of a single-phase solid solution (Fig. 2d).
The microstructural characterisation of the APS coated samples with AlCoCrFeNi HEA is depicted in Fig. 3.The SEM reveals the intricate investigation of the surface and splat morphology of the coated samples at different magnifications.The coating is uniformly distributed throughout the surface of the test sample as a cause of the homogenous composition of HEA.The homogenized structure resulted in enhanced bonding between coated  www.nature.com/scientificreports/HEA and the substrate.This stronger induced intermolecular interactions resulted in the prominent strength and significantly reliable bond.These interfacial bonds augment varied mechanical properties making them feasible for a wide variety of applications.Figure 3a depicts SEM images which showcase lamellar structure with minor pores.The lamellar structure is the prominent structural unit of coating microstructure in comparison with the crystalline orientation, boundaries of grain or other structural features.The formation of minor pores is the formation of oxides resulting due the uneven process temperature.The overview also depicts dark and light splats due to the outcome of high thermal energy advertised during the coating process.These splats are the outcome of the solidification of the melt droplets and the dispersion of the same at an accelerated temperature.The EDS mapping of the coating surface as shown in Fig. 3b confirms the presence and complete availability of the HEA powder as a coating.The XRD peaks shown in Fig. 3c reveals the evolution of major BCC and minor FCC phase.
Figure 4 shows the optical micrograph of the base substrate and annealed APS **coated samples with AlCoCr-FeNi HEA. Figure 4a-d reveals the optical micrograph of the base substrate at different annealing temperatures.Figure 4e-h reveals the optical micrograph images of APS coated samples with AlCoCrFeNi HEA. Figure 4a reveals the voids depicted at 400° C during the annealing resulting in distributed lamellar grain structure.Further, the increase in annealing to 550 °C showcased less void and closer grain structure.This indicates a reduction in the dislocation of the grain structure and release in the internal stress of the samples (Fig. 4b).Adding up to the temperature beyond 550 °C, there is a significant change in the grain boundaries along with the reduction in recrystallisation.This results in the dispersion of the grain structure in comparison with the previous temperature (Fig. 4c).Further subjecting it at 850 °C, there are predominant changes in the gradient microstructure (Fig. 4d). Figure 4e reveals the optical micrograph of sprayed sample annealed at 400 °C and no prominent grain growth and dark phases are observed which reveals the voids and the oxides formed.Further, an increase in the temperature to 550 °C results in more refined grain boundaries that are dense and stable (Fig. 4f).At an elevated temperature of 700 °C, there is a significant increase in the grain size and a reduction in the pores is also noticed (Fig. 4g).This is similar to the condition at 850 °C where the dark phase is spread throughout due to the release in the internal stress (Fig. 4h).
The SEM microstructure of the AlCoCrFeNi HEA coated samples post annealing is depicted in Fig. 5. Figure 5a depicts the SEM image of the HEA coated sample at 400 °C which reveals to have an irregular grain structure along with visible voids.There are both light and dark phases which are discontinuous throughout the surface.Elevating the temperature to 550 °C, the dark phases are spread throughout resulting in a more refined grain boundary due to the precipitated phase formation in between the layers (Fig. 5b).This results in the improvement of the recrystallization temperature of the sample.At 700 °C annealing of the coated sample showcased increased and elongated grain boundary in comparison with other lower temperatures (Fig. 5c).There is a significant increase in the grain size and unfused oxides with micropores are visible.Figure 5d reveals the image of the HEA coated samples annealed at 850 °C, these portray huge void grain structures throughout the surface and a notable reduction in the pores on the surface due to annealing.The EDS and elemental mapping of the coated sample annealed at 550 °C is shown in Fig. 6a,b.The mapping confirms the presence of all the elements posts the annealing process.The XRD crystallography reveals the phase structure has not changed post annealing and remains as major BCC and minor FCC (Fig. 6c).It is observed that the presence of oxide layer increases mildly with an increase in temperature.The rate of oxidation in high temperature is very mild which denotes HEA coating is highly resistant to oxidation at higher temperature.
The grain structure of the coated sample annealed at 550 °C is shown in Fig. 7a.The grain structure evinces the refinement of grains under the annealing process.The average grain size is observed to be 15 µm.The grain angle boundary and grain boundary distribution is shown in Fig. 7b,c respectively.It is observed that the fraction of low-angle grain boundary is large compared to that of high-angle grain boundary by nearly 80%.This provides an improvement in the strength and characteristics of the coating.The constrained dislocation and grain growth at annealing temperature are awarded to the deposition of HEA particles as a coating on the surface [31][32][33] .

Microhardness evaluation
The Vickers microhardness of the uncoated and APS coated samples are plotted in the graph shown in Fig. 8.The average microhardness of the coated samples is 794 HV.The microhardness for the samples annealed at low temperatures (400 °C, 550 °C) showed improvement in hardness whereas annealing at higher temperatures (700 °C, 850 °C) decreased the hardness.This shows that the material has excellent softening resistance at low temperatures for the APS coated samples.The coated sample annealed at 550 °C exhibited 46% improvement in microhardness than the uncoated sample after annealing.Decreased microhardness of samples annealed at high temperatures was due to the softening of material caused by the presence of the sigma phase on the steel substrate.The presence of the BCC phase in the coating and annealing sample hampers the dislocation movement aiding in the improvement of hardness.However, the minor FCC phase, at high temperatures, becomes more ductile forcing a drop in microhardness 34,35 .The improved microhardness for the annealed samples at 550 °C can be validated by the presence of a major BCC phase and is supported by the XRD analysis 36 .The drop in hardness at high temperatures is also attributed to the grain growth and coarsening of grains.Annealing at high temperature results in grain growth and phase shifts ensuring the materials to soften thereby a decrease in hardness 37,38 .Thus, the following tests are conducted for the samples annealed at 550 °C because of the better microhardness achieved.

Electrochemical corrosion behaviour
The potentiodynamic polarisation curve for the coated sample pre and post annealing at 550 °C is presented in Fig. 9a and compared with the uncoated sample.As the microhardness of the coated sample was better at 550 °C, the corrosion tests were conducted for the samples annealed at 550 °C.The passivation area in the PDP curve is observed to be larger thereby inferring strong oxide layer formation over the surface 39 .The corrosion current It is apparent that the annealed coated sample exhibits better corrosion potential.The HEA coating over the surface acts as the protection layer and disintegrates any pits or crack formation thereby improving the corrosion resistance.The high entropy effect of the coated HEA powder aids in the formation of a passivation layer over the steel substrate 40 .The annealed sample exhibited improved corrosion resistance against the coated sample pre annealing and obvious improvement over the uncoated samples.The accelerated effect of the sulphide from the electrolyte induces corrosion.The passivation layer impedes the sulphide layer and improves the corrosion property.The passive layer formed is highly stable due to the inherent characteristics of the coated HEA like high entropy effect, sluggish diffusion and the presence of elements that forms a passive layer that includes Al and Cr 41 .The polarization behaviour and potential range unveil oxygen reduction to be the dominant cathodic reaction.The grain refinement attained through annealing conducts oxide films at a faster rate and offers better control over anodic responses and ionic conduction which is in line with other studies 42 .Stern Geary equation is used to evaluate the polarization resistance and is shown in Table 2.The polarization resistance is higher for the coated and annealed sample and this verifies the trend attained in the PDP curve.This result is also upheld by the Nyquist plot shown in Fig. 9b.The capacitive loop in the Nyquist plot should be greater to provide better corrosion resistance which is inferred from relevant studies 43 .The capacitive loop for the coated and annealed sample is large compared to other samples indicating the coated and annealed samples have excellent corrosion resistance.The mechanism associated with the electrochemical reaction of the coating under H 2 SO 4 solution is presented in Fig. 10.
The SEM morphology of the corroded surface of the coated and annealed sample is shown in Fig. 11a.The presence of pits, cracks and oxide layer is observed in the SEM image.The pits formed are close to the oxide layer inferring the occurrence of galvanic corrosion between the coating and the oxides 44 .The porous oxide layer formed in the H 2 SO 4 solution weakens the galvanic attack and is consistent with a similar study 45 .The elemental mapping evinces the formation of severe and stable oxide film (Fig. 11b).The lasting oxide layer formed on the corroded surface protects the severe corrosive action against the strong acid electrolyte and provides better corrosion resistance.The presence of sulphur is minor on the corroded surface which relieves the fact that sulphur accelerates the corrosion by deteriorating the oxide layer.The formation of Co(OH) 2 , Fe(OH) 3 , and Cr(OH) 3 , evident from the XRD peaks, contribute to the passivation behaviour (Fig. 11c).The cross section of the corroded surface of the coated and annealed sample is shown in Fig. 12.The surface presented the formation of pits and cracks.The oxide layer formation alongside the AlCoCrFeNi HEA coating enhances the outcome by providing excellent corrosion resistance.Table 3 summarises the corrosion products formed on the corroded surface of the coated and annealed sample.www.nature.com/scientificreports/

Hot corrosion analysis
The hot corrosion analysis of the coated sample annealed at 550 °C and tested at an elevated temperature of 900 °C is completed and the graph plot results in Fig. 13.The weight gain versus the number of cycle trends shows that coated and annealed samples exhibit minimum weight gain under all three salt mixtures.Since salt mixtures B and C have slightly harsh mixtures, the weight gain for the same is marginally high than mixture A. The weight gain of the coated and annealed sample was reduced by 10.1%, 8.49% and 10.36% to the coated sample pre annealing and 44.09%, 44.25% and 42.09% to the uncoated sample pre annealing under salt mixtures A, B and C respectively.The hot corrosion mechanism is inclusive of three stages including the incubation stage, initiation stage and propagation stage (Fig. 14).The initial stage of hot corrosion includes incubation that instigates normal oxidation shortly after the application of the salt.This is supposedly producing stable oxides not deteriorating the corrosion properties of the samples.Further followed by initiation, which includes the application of the  salt and is subjected to the required temperature.During this stage, a protective oxide layer is already embedded on the surface of the coating that is produced during the initiation stage.As there is a significant elevation in the temperature, an active sulphide layer is formed which deteriorates the protective oxide layer 46 .The internal sulphide formed selectively depletes and dissolute the oxide layer gradually leading to the reduction in corrosion resistance and direct contact with the coated surface 47 .This direct contact with the coated surface results in the acceleration of the corrosion of the samples.propagation stage includes the interaction between the surface oxide scale along the substrate with respect to the molten salt.The mechanism is called fluxing where external diffusing of the Al and Cr are resulted due to their respective diffusion coefficient resulting in propagation of corresponding corrosion along with the presence of chloride ions.These chloride ions diffuse Al or Cr from the alloy which eventually results in the outcome of highly volatile gaseous chloride in the depleted portion of the pore as a result it has a reduction in the mechanical properties.This diffusion results in oxide conversion and more oxidations happen resulting in the deteriorated corrosion property.The surface morphology of the corroded samples under all conditions is depicted in Figs. 15, 16, 17.The formation of pits, cracks, spallation and pores are observed from the SEM image (Fig. 18).The formation of corrosive products like Fe 3 O 4 , Cr 2 O 3 , Cr 2 SO 4 , VO 4 , Na 3 VO 4, NaVO 3 , and Ni 3 (VO 4 ) 2 is validated from the XRD (Fig. 19).The salt applied over the surface when exposed to high temperatures will form molten deposits on the surface.These molten deposits will destroy the protective oxide layer formed and infiltrate into the core of the metal.The pores and pits are seen as trivial on the coated and annealed sample compared to other samples because of the HEA layer that offers better thermal stability and corrosion resistance.The sulphates and vanadates formed have a lower melting point and accelerate corrosion by initiating the fluxing reaction.These flux reactions will penetrate deep enough and the strong effect in high temperature causes the hole formation 48 .Due to the mixture of salt available, the accelerated corrosion by the chloride ions is defended by the sulphates formed due to their low solubility and protects against the formation of harsh corrosive products 49 .Vanadium lowers the activation energy for oxidation or sulfidation reactions, facilitating the formation of reactive species.The depth of pits despite the integrity of the HEA coating indicates the salt medium penetrates through the micro-pores formed during the process and attacks the metal matrix.This effect of absorption of porous sulphur or other ions through micro-cracks is termed capillarity action.The elemental mapping of the coated sample post annealing under salt mixture C is shown in Fig. 18.But the depth of the crack is not deep enough as compared to a similar case observed in a relevant study 50 .Table 4 summarises the corrosion products formed on the surface after the hot corrosion test under three salt mixtures.

Conclusion
• SS316l is successfully coated with gas-atomised AlCoCrFeNi HEA particles of 23 µm mean particle size and annealed.
• The microstructural analysis of the coating exhibited uniform and dense coating with the homogeneous scattering of the HEA particles.The annealing process revealed the grain growth and the formation of oxide    • The microhardness evaluation resulted in 46% improvement for the coated sample annealed at 550 °C than the uncoated sample after annealing through the grain refinement by the annealing process.The softening of the materials led to the decrement in microhardness at higher temperature.• The PDP curve from the electrochemical corrosion test resulted improved corrosion resistance for the coated sample annealed at 550 °C and is reflected in the Nyquist plot.The morphology of the corroded surface revealed the formation of a protective oxide layer along with minor pits and cracks.• The hot corrosion test with three different salt mixtures also revealed better resistance to corrosion at high temperatures for the coated sample annealed at 550 °C by 10.1%, 8.49% and 10.36% than the coated sample pre annealing and 44.09%, 44.25% and 42.09% than the uncoated sample pre annealing under salt mixtures A, B and C respectively.The microstructural analysis of the corroded surfaces revealed the formation of some oxide layers, pits cracks and spallation alongside the formation of corrosive products.
The outcomes of this study reinforce the expansion of the annealing and coating of the stainless steel with HEA and ensuing enhanced properties to aid the challenging nature faced in industries.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Major stages involved in the formulated methodology.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. (a) SEM image of the coating cross section (b) EDS mapping of the coating surface (c) XRD peaks of the coating.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.(a) EDS (b) elemental mapping of the coated sample annealed at 550 °C (c) XRD of the coated and annealed samples.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. (a) PDP curve (b) Nyquist plot for the coated and annealed sample.

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.(a) SEM figure (b) elemental mapping (c) XRD peaks of the corroded surface of the coated and annealed sample.

Figure 12 .
Figure 12.Cross section of the corroded surface of the coated and annealed sample.

Figure 15 .
Figure 15.SEM images of the hot corroded surface under mixture A: (a) uncoated sample(b) uncoated sample post annealing (c) coated sample (d) coated sample post annealing (e) cross section of coated sample post annealing.

Figure 16 .
Figure 16.SEM images of the hot corroded surface under mixture B: (a) uncoated sample(b) uncoated sample post annealing (c) coated sample (d) coated sample post annealing (e) cross section of coated sample post annealing.

Figure 17 .
Figure 17.SEM images of the hot corroded surface under mixture C: (a) uncoated sample (b) uncoated sample post annealing (c) coated sample (d) coated sample post annealing (e) cross section of coated sample post annealing.

Figure 18 .
Figure 18.(a) Elemental mapping (b) EDS mapping of the cross section of the coated and annealed surface corroded under salt mixture C.

Figure 19 .
Figure 19.XRD peaks of the corroded surface of the coated and annealed sample.

Table 2 .
Corrosion current density, potential and polarisation resistance for the test samples.

Table 3 .
Elemental compositions of the corrosion products from electrochemical corrosion test.

Table 4 .
Elemental compositions of the corrosion products from hot corrosion test.